<DIRECTORY

Part XIX: Christianity


I strongly urge you to once again read Part III before reading this section of The Series. I hereby include by reference, as though fully set forth herein, Part III as the introduction to Part XIX. - David

They........ Contemplate government as a private monopoly and the people as hereditary property."

- Thomas Paine

"Two Different and Distinct Nations

"The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to... I take leave to say that, if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system will result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of a constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism... It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside the Supreme Law of the Land finds lodgment in our Constitutional Jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution."

- Honorable Supreme Court Justice John Harlan in the 1901 case of Downes v. Bidwell.

Of course, as we have learned, this was a foregone conclusion long before 1901, and was the deliberate, intended result which was decided upon by the very wording of the Constitution as it was approved in it’s final form by the King of England and his bankers. But then, this is/was simply another step in the ages old war which so few are aware of but which is a constant and has been a constant upon this earth since before Adam/Man was first given the breath of life by the Creator.

"For we have to struggle, not with flesh and blood but with the angelic Rulers, the angelic Authorities, the potentates of the dark present, the spirit-forces of evil in the heavenly sphere. So take God’s armour, that you may be able to make a stand upon the evil day and hold your ground by overcoming all the foe".

- Ephesians Chapter 6:12, 13. The Bible, James Moffatt Translation

Why are we here, and what is the purpose of our existence? I do not have all of these answers, and I suspect that no man can have them, as they are solely the prerogative of the Creator of the Universe. However, there are a number of things, which are of paramount importance in understanding our relationship with, and for, the Creator. That is the purpose of this Part of the Series, to show a portion of that relationship, and begin to understand perhaps, the meaning of life. But, to understand the meaning of life, we first must understand that it is to Him that we owe our very existence now, and into the future. We exist at His Pleasure, and for His Purposes, solely.

It was because of this that the first Parts of the Series must be written. To begin to understand, you must first get rid of the false "beliefs" within your own minds. You must first begin to see the actual world around you and begin to appreciate your amplified existence "within" that world. You must first begin to understand His Law and how it operates as a Sovereign Power in The Law’s own Right. His Law is not enforced; it enforces itself. Quite a difference between His Law and man’s "law" where armed might decides whose law operates the tax system. This reveals to you Who has the actual Right to make Law, and the lie of man made law.

And to be honest with you, this Part is an adjustment paper "within" the Series itself. If not for you, then it has been for me. I had decided upon, and nearly finished, Part XIX before my computer problem arose. Given another two or three days, Part XIX would have been out to everyone. Instead, nothing of the more than 90 pages of Part XIX existed. And this paper is far, far different from what that one was, or would have been. And it has been very difficult to write. And the difficulty was because of the adjustments that I was making, and decisions I was faced with in evaluating new information.

I mention this for one reason; you are in the same position. I am now in contact with far more people than I have been in the past, and because of the Posting I do with information, in return I am blessed (?) with a flood of information. Not all of this information is correct, or even sensible, but there is a percentage of it that demands attention. It has been a few pieces of this information that has caused my problem with this Part of The Series. And you have the same problem, with massive doses of information, and you are just as vulnerable as I am.

Once you start to realize how completely we have been lied too, you begin to search for new information to describe and explain what actually exists. This means you are open to new ideas, and this is good, provided you do the work necessary to verify what you are told. It took me a long time to work through the information that was going to end this Part XIX, and most of it was discarded, because I did the work necessary to understand and learn. So must you, or you will turn from His Path and take the road to nowhere. This includes what I tell you. You are responsible; not I. I have my own responsibilities, and must face them, but I can not be responsible for you. This is the first lesson that we must each face and accept. It is, in a way, also the single most difficult lesson of life that we face, accepting personal responsibility.

A Review…

A small part of this is a review, perhaps, but I think it is necessary.

What is the earth? Is it just a ball of rock floating in space? Or is there more to the story than this? Earlier in the Series, we discussed a "live" earth; that the center of the earth is a molten dynamo with currents within it which generate electricity, and that without this dynamo, life could not exist upon this "ball of rock." This electricity generation is the very basis of our lives. All operations of our bodies, and the bodies of all living things upon the earth, require this electricity for life. Without this internal dynamo, we can not and would not exist here. The same is true for any other "planet" which may or may not exist in the Universe. Are there others? I know that if there are, it is because the Creator wished there to be, because without intelligent design and intent, such a planet can not exist.

But there is more to this story than the simple explanation of "a live planet." For within this fact of life is also revealed, if you understand enough, our relationship with the Creator, and our relationship with all other life on this planet. We are, basically, electrical beings. All thoughts and the total operation of our body are done through electricity (some of this "electricity" comes from chemical reaction). Because of this, our bodies give off what could be called a "hum," or what is better known as an aura, which is measurable. I have mentioned this earlier in the Series.

But what is interesting about this aura is that it is serves other purposes as well. If we wear the wrong types of fibers (particularly plastics), or mixed fibers, this aura is stunted, and this stunting can tire you, as well as injure your body over a significant period of time. But, the issue is more important than this. For this aura serves other purposes as well, and one of them is defense.

Let us talk about plants for just a moment. Plants, as well as animals, have the same thing, an aura. Strong, healthy plants have a very strong, repellant aura for insects. Perhaps you have seen the sonic devices sold in stores that repeal rodents and insects? They work under the same principle as plants use, only plants have been using this for thousands of years! When you have weak plants, devoid of nutrition and abused by an overuse of chemicals, they have no repellent properties for insects. It is akin to hanging up and ringing a dinner bell for insects to plant and water such crops. This is true in your garden as well as for farmers, but it does create a wonderful business opportunity for the chemical companies to sell more chemicals to kill the insects so that you can harvest the plants you are growing, which are basically worthless as food.

So, does this mean that strong, healthy, nutritious plants will never be attacked by insects? No, it simply means that insects will attack the weakest first. If they can find no weak plants, they will attempt to eat the healthy ones. This is a difficult task, and they will always look for the weakest ones first. This is known as the balance of nature, and unless it is interfered with, would always work to keep you, through the plants you use for food, at their healthiest, and the numbers of insects at the lowest possible level consistent with cleaning up the environment, instead of feeding off of live plants intended as food for you and I.

The same is true in the animal kingdom, and the injured and sick animals have little or no aura. The strongest animal in a pack invariably has the strongest aura, and this aura is kept at it’s peak by his being fed the most, first, of live, or recently live, food.

Perhaps this gives you another clue about live food, and how important at least a small portion of live food (strictly from plants, of course) is for you. You have an aura. How that aura is perceived by others, particularly insects and animals, can have an impact upon your life in many ways. An interesting area of study is essential oils, and I have not studied this subject as I should have. But essential oils can boost your aura instantly, and help to keep your body operating at peak efficiency. And do such things as repel insects and other animals.

I do not have a problem with most dogs (saying this a week after getting bit because I ignored a warning from a dog). Most dogs will take to me instantly. With some, it takes a little longer, but eventually most any dog I come into contact with will be at my side or at my feet, if I am sitting. I understand why. My aura is stronger than most anyone else around me and dogs, and other animals, recognize this.

The same is true of insects. When you are out in the open, if you want to attract as many insects as possible, wear a nylon wind breaker, and eat pork before going out. The nylon will suppress your aura, and the pork odor of filth will do the rest. Now, one other aspect of this which I do not like is the effect of coffee on the aura. It suppresses it severely.

Once you begin to understand the basics of these subjects, the relationship of you and the earth Created for you, and how it all works in perfect harmony, becomes apparent. It is a crime against the Creator that such is not taught in our so-called churches. Even if the science behind Scripture is not known or taught, just the fact that Scripture is ignored in favor of man’s word is a crime of the worst degree, for which these "religious" men will pay a price far beyond what anyone of us can imagine.

Now, understanding the vibratory aura that our bodies gives off also reveals more of why we are commanded to be with those of like mind. And body. When your aura is unrestrained and operating correctly, you are not going to like being around those whose aura does not complement yours, and I assure you, those who have weak auras are not going to like you. These are a natural, even if unknown, repellent factor involved. It is automatic, and it is unavoidable. It is also unavoidable that you are not going to have a natural, strong and healthy aura living in a city. It simply is not possible to live in filth and corruption and have a strong body, and aura. (Consider how this relates to the filth and degradation of sodomites.)

ACRES USA has some interesting books on electricity and the body for sale in their book catalog. If they have not sent you one as yet, I suggest you ask for the catalog. I have not read these books, but the titles and the descriptions for the books are very interesting indeed.

Once you begin to see these factors of health and of life, natural living, without chemicals and without filth, becomes much more important in your life, and in the lives of your children, family, neighbors and friends. It is this strength of mind and body which made the Israelites so strong and invincible, because they followed the Laws of the Creator in every detail, and His enemies were not able to stand before them. Without this strength, it is not possible to overcome the enemies of the Creator. Without this detail of obedience to His Law, it is not possible to stand beside Him.

And since none of us, as is explained in Scripture, are Righteous Men, this is the reason for Grace, for without Grace, none of us would ever stand before Him, forgiven of our sins (of disobedience) and invited into His Presence for all Eternity. He is a Truly Righteous, and Forgiving, Power, Who has demonstrated time and time again His Love for us. Yet we continue to turn our backs on Him, and we must overcome this, and this is why we are here. We are here to learn. To learn the meaning of His Word, and His Law, and why The Word exists, and why we exist, to serve His Purposes.

I want you to carefully consider something: why did He write His Law? Does God the Creator of His Universe need His Law? Was it written for Him? No, it certainly was not; it was written solely for us; for our sole benefit. Let me give you an example of what I mean. Why are we commanded to keep the Sabbath? And I have heard the nonsense about not keeping the Sabbath outside of the so-called Promised Land, but this ignores the purpose of His Law. His Law is for our benefit; so, how can it be argued that you can not keep His Law outside of the Promised Land?

Within this Commandment to rest, in His Name, on the Seventh Day, we find the answer to stress, family problems caused by lack of communication, and the regeneration our bodies need each week. We are being told that we need approximately 1/7 of the Time allotted to us on this earth to be spent in rest. And, this Time must be in a block; not five minutes here and ten there; one, complete, total day of the week, with no work, solely for the family and friends. One Day, for Him, or for us? Which is it? Well, understanding the nature of His Law, it is obvious that it is for us, in His Name, and what could make more sense? Now, once you begin to understand this, completely, how His Law is for our benefit, you can use this knowledge to identify when you are being led astray. Everything which is designed to lead you away from Him is done as a violation of His Law. Since this means that everything designed to lead us away from Him is destructive of us, how smart are we not to understand His Law and the benefits thereof, for us?

For instance, cleanliness is next to godliness does not refer to washing your hands, as my mother told me so many times! It refers to the cleanliness of your mind, your body, and your way of life. All of these make up cleanliness. I really hope you read Post Number 117, Diet and Health (sugar) and begin changing how you and your family live and eat. Children are not conceived with a desire for sugar, nor any other addictive substance. They are taught to like this filth by their parents. Oh, by the way, that is you. And that you were raised in this manner is no excuse. Your job is to learn, and to do better than your parents did, particularly for your children. This is your primary job, your primary duty, here; to learn, and to start your children correctly on His Path, with learning. In years past, most people understood this, and this is why no one would have dared to dictate to those people what was to be taught to their children. Perhaps this explains to you why children are having so many problems today, and why they seem so lost and insecure (for reference, see suicide rates of teenagers today).

Healthy living, to clear your mind, and to increase your ability to think. And the ability of your family and friends to think. This is why the Israelites were so strong, and this is why they were destroyed, because they became pagans, and lost their advantage in His Word. They lost their strength. They reverted to filth and the practices of the pagans, forgetting the basics of why they always prevailed over their enemies. To understand this a little better, read Scripture closely and pay particular attention to the portions dealing with handling dead bodies. Here it is revealed to you how very careful cleanliness must be adhered to, and understanding parasites and the electricity of the earth explains the reasons for this.

And this means, as well, that you must learn and use the healthy, natural cures for what ails you and your family instead of depending upon the filth of animal pus injected by the system into your bodies and the bodies of your children to weaken your immune systems.

Subject: Vaccination
From: Dale Pond <dalesvp@ipa.net>
Organization: Delta Spectrum Research

It is exactly for this reason that I developed Our Silver Works!

We may not be able to escape being vaccinated. (After the fraudulent toxin release by you know who, those refusing to be vaccinated will be hunted down as "carriers" and "a threat to the public" and will be exterminated with extreme prejudice.) But we can insure those vaccinations will not harm us should we be forced to take them.

Warm regards, Dale Pond
Delta Spectrum Research
http://www.SVPvril.com
Sympathetic Vibratory Physics
Sacred Science - Sacred Life
SVP Discussion Forum: http://www.egroups.com/list/svpvril/

About five years ago, I ripped my hand moving some very heavy pieces of equipment. Actually not a rip, but a tear, at the base of the thumb, and the separation went nearly to the bone in the hand. This came because I am very strong, and I applied a lot of force against an edge of metal, which simply parted the skin. I went to a doctor for this, and he sewed it up, after washing it out thoroughly with hydrogen peroxide. We also had quite an argument about a tetanus shot, which I refused.

These kinds of problems (torn flesh; broken bones) are for doctors, provided that you understand the basis behind healing bones (it is a welding process involving oxygen carried by the blood which automatically collects around such a break in the bone, and certain minerals). Correctly knitting bones back together can be done very quickly by adding the correct minerals to the body following a break. But to go to a doctor, and ask him to "practice medicine" on you is no different than requesting "healing magic" from the witchdoctor. In fact, if you study pharmacopoeia, you will find it is distressingly similar. Health is a personal responsibility, and asking a doctor to absolve you of the problems created by disobedience to His Law is a formula for dis-ease, pain and death. The above site has information that will help you to understand much better, but the basis is still proper nutrition and actual, live food.

Supermarkets, and "fresh fruits and vegetables." Right?

Well, actually, no. These products are picked raw, held in cold storage, and usually, hit with a chemical bath to "ripen" (color up the skin) of the product just before it is delivered to the "supermarket." But, even in the case of bananas, which usually need no coloring (some are given a chemical bath just before delivery), they are still picked raw. This destroys the ability of the fruit or vegetable to nourish, because up to 90% of the benefit from these items only comes into being as the fruit or vegetable is ripening on the plant.

Now, I want you to think about this: what happens to an expectant mother who has a child growing in her, and is eating out of a supermarket. If the child is to be healthy, where are the vitamins, minerals and the other building blocks for this new life to come from? And if the mother’s body is very weak, might this have "something" to do with the increase in birth defects and other problems with new babies? Might this also have something to do with the malaise that so many young mothers experience after child birth, when their body has been robbed of everything necessary to create that new life, and they have not been putting anything back into their bodies? Perhaps there is something to think about here. Please read the following carefully, and I really think you should subscribe to this newsletter. It is free.

Hallelujah Health Tip Issue No. 62 January 11, 1999

Hallelujah Health Tip, No. 62, is going to be different than the previous 61 issues.

Different in that you have a new editor!

My name is Rev. George Malkmus, founder and President of Hallelujah Acres. As of this issue of the Hallelujah Health Tip, I will be taking over the reins from Chet Day, who so ably handled this position for over a year.

Chet came on board here at Hallelujah Acres during the summer of 1997. One of the primary reasons Chet joined us was to create a web site for Hallelujah Acres.

While we were reaching hundreds of thousands through the printed page, we realized we could greatly expand our ministry and minister to potentially millions more through electronic communication.

Chet has developed a web site for us, plus much more, and done a masterful job! Our web site has grown from nothing to a worldwide outreach affecting multitudes. Daily, including Saturdays and Sundays, we currently receive between 100 and 400 pieces of mail off the Internet. Literally thousands around the world are learning of our ministry and being helped.

During the fall of 1997, the Hallelujah Health Tip had its beginning and Chet has done a wonderful job developing it, maintaining it, and writing articles for it.

Now Chet feels a burden to return to what he was doing before he joined us, which was researching the alternative health field and publishing Health and Beyond.

If you would like to keep up with what Chet is doing, you can subscribe to his free e-mail publication, Health and Beyond Weekly. Send a note to subscribe@chetday.com and he'll sign you right up. (I recommend you do this as well; the latest subscription location I have is: hbweekly-subscribe@onelist.com – David)

For the remainder of this Health Tip, l would like to share a little about what you can expect in future issues:

Tips on how you can improve your health naturally. Answer letters and questions regarding Biblical Nutrition! Keep you up to date as to what is happening in the Alternative Health Field! Share testimonies from those who have been helped through this ministry! Keep you abreast as to what is happening here at Hallelujah Acres, including where seminars are being held. Share recipes that will make the Hallelujah Diet more appetizing and doable! I will try and keep it varied, as well as challenging and exciting!

I would appreciate hearing from you as to what you would like to see covered in future Health Tips. Send your thoughts, ideas, and testimonies to george@hacres.com. I will do my best to personally read each letter, but I cannot guarantee a personal response because of my traveling and extremely heavy workload. If I receive enough questions on a particular subject, I will address that question in a future Health Tip or post it in our new and greatly expanded Hallelujah Diet Frequently Asked Questions.

I will do my best to send out a Health Tip at least twice a month, but because I am frequently on the road doing seminars, I cannot guarantee exactly what day of the week future issues will go out.

Every day, testimonies come in from all over the world from people who have been helped by this ministry. Let me share a few of them with you:

"Dear George & Rhonda: I have experienced so many wonderful changes in my health since I started on the Hallelujah Diet in April of 1998. I have lost 23 lbs. And ALL of my arthritis is gone and it feels great to be pain free - no more scratchy joints and constant discomforts. I was so surprised to see all the other little improvements that I didn't even expect. Thank you for this marvelous message." - Beverly

"Dear Dr. George: It's me, Jonathan, I know you don't know me, but I've been studying some of your materials, and they have been such a blessing to me and my family. Thank you and Glory to God. I am using the information that you wrote about in your books to help me honor God in my body, and I am reaping tremendous results in return. But, I am not writing this to talk about me. I am writing this because there are friends of mine that are being 'destroyed for lack of knowledge.' I try to help them as much as I can, with what I have learned, but I am only a child 15 years old. And so I would be very grateful if you would send your Back to the Garden newsletter to the following people as soon as possible." - Jonathan

George's Closing Words

That's it for issue No. 62 of the Hallelujah Health Tip. I look forward to visiting you at least 26 times in 1999. Rhonda and the staff here at Hallelujah Acres join me in sending our love and best wishes for a fabulous 1999, and I trust this new year will be the very best year ever in both your life and home.

Rev. George Malkmus george@hacres.com

Editor, Hallelujah Health Tip

There is a lot to the science of eating, and none of it involves the filth produced for profit by the multi-national corporations. This is the choice you must make, and the sooner you make it, the sooner you will begin to understand health, and experience the benefits designed into the earth for us by The Creator.

http://howtoplans.com/ozone_generator.html

BUILD YOUR OWN OZONE GENERATOR FOR UNDER $50.00!

What is Ozone?

Ozone is a benign non-persistent molecule with a very short half-life. Ozone, known as the "sanitary gas" or activated oxygen, has been proven to kill 99.9% of all known bacteria including salmonella and e-colli. Ozone is used to literally destroy odors by breaking down the biological structure of the offender, whether it be air-borne or at the source. Unlike conventional air fresheners that only serve to mask odors, ozone seeks out and destroys the offender at the source.

Although ozone is very powerful, it has a very short life cycle. When O3 is introduced into an area and comes in contact with bacteria, viruses, etc., the extra molecule of oxygen destroys its victims by rapid oxidation, the final result being a fresh clean smelling room.

Applications

Greenhouse and Hydroponics Applications

The application of ozone in the hydroponic and greenhouse industry has been used successfully for many years to eradicate viruses, molds, bacteria and general air pollution. The proper setup, use and maintenance of an ozone generator will create a productive, healthy, safe and controlled environment, unfavorable for the proliferation of molds, bacteria, viruses and every undesirable odor.

Other Applications

Ozone is used in hundreds of applications and spans a vast array of markets including:

Restaurants, pubs, hospitals, workshops, offices, greenhouses, factories, homes, public, washrooms, farms, processing plants, waste treatment areas.

Why Build an Ozone Unit?

The construction of an "ozone generator" seems to be a technology reserved strictly for the high tech firms, but quite the opposite is true. The basic workbench principle is easy to understand and the actual construction can be carried out by anyone who can follow simple instruction and has access to a basic inventory of home handyman tools.

Following is a dealers' list taken from the internet, names and model #'s are not included for obvious reasons, but I would like to state here: a little initiative will save you hundreds of dollars!

This example is taken from an actual price list, however, the unit output versus price varies greatly from dealer to dealer. All quotes are in Canadian dollars.

Output Price
800 mg./hr. $ 535.00
2.4 g/hr $ 1,495.00
13 g./hr. . $2,850.00
20 g/hr. $ 3,900.00

PLANS I AM SELLING PUT OUT APPROXIMATELY 2.4 G./HR.

As you can see, many dealers and manufacturers are charging huge markups for the miracle these machines perform. I am offering these simple-to-follow plans for only $14.95 Cdn. postage and handling included.

Plans Include

detailed plans for assembly in an easy-to-understand format
detailed list of parts
where to locate the required parts
tools you will need
installation instructions
maintenance and safety precautions
what the unit should and should not do
suggestions and tips.
ALL FOR ONLY $14.95!

For your copy, send a cheque or money order payable to:
P. McLean
# 34 - 1150 N. Terminal Ave.,
Unit #107, Nanaimo, BC
V9S - 5L6

Email Us paul@howtoplans.com

I have not looked at these plans, but I have corresponded with the man selling them and he assures me that the machine will work as advertised. I strongly recommend that you have an Ozone machine. It is one of the best investments that your family can make. I do doubt that any worthwhile machine can be built for the price mentioned. I have talked with a number of people who build these machines, and no one I know can come close to this figure for the parts. But then, perhaps there is a different way of doing this that I am not aware of. If you do not want to build your own unit, I do have a source for them and would be happy to get you a machine.

The following perhaps belongs in Part XX rather than here, but I think that this is information which you need now, to begin to prepare, and to learn. And I am referring to you learning a useful skill, one which is marketable outside of the United States. One which will make you an asset to any community you join.

The Old Timer's Page: http://waltonfeed.com/old/default.htm

The Old Timer's Page; The Way We Used To Do it...

When my grandfather got his first tractor he decided to keep his horses and old horse-drawn equipment in case the day ever came when he couldn't buy gas or tractor parts. Grandpa, his horses and farm machinery are now gone. But his vision lives on.

The Spring House
The Ice House
Building a Root Cellar (5 pages)
Potting Meat
Salt Curing Meat
Yeast Cultures for Bread Making
Making Bread in a wood burning oven
Making Butter
Making Sauerkraut
Soap Making (9 pages & 3 Sites)
Growing and Harvesting Wheat By Hand
Building a Cistern
The Out House
Memories, by Libby Maxwell
Just for Fun - The Homestead House
Just for Fun - Getting Electricity
Just for Fun - Getting Water

Links to Other Sites

Old Time Trade Exhibitions at Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia.
The 1850 Westville, GA Living History Museum See 1850's cooking, candle making,
buildings & furnishings, black smithing, spinning and weaving, pottery making...
Colonial Pennsylvania Plantation
Association of Personal Historians. Helping people preserve their life stories.
The Online Homesteading and Small Farming Resource
Spinning Wheel FAQs by Christine Jordan
Handmade Parchment & Vellum
Cheese Making
Hand weavers Guild of America, Inc.
Cisterns by the University of Florida
The Rural Resource Center
The Kansas Pioneer Way of Life by Norris Torrance
Jackie's Smoke House
The Rug maker's Homestead '99 Learn to make a rag rug.
Old type bread baking ovens
The Home Steader Web Ring
Family History of Walter Scott
The John C. Campbell Folk School

It has been said that when a person dies a library burns. Only those who have tried to compile a life story on someone who has departed this life knows what a reality this is. Today there is an increasing self-awareness among many toward becoming more self-reliant. We try new things and - in my opinion - try to re-invent the wheel. The pioneers of 100 years ago were already more self-sufficient than most of us will ever be. Perhaps instead of looking to the future and new ways of doing things, we ought to at least take a small look into the past and re-acquaint ourselves with the old ways that are proven, that work, yet are nearly forgotten. The subjects listed on this page comes from the old folks themselves. Occasionally their stories have been supplemented with newer ways of doing the same things, but generally the ideas and methods remain theirs.

Please read the above, visit the site, and begin to learn and understand that you/we are living in the aberration. The time of today is not what is real, or in your best interest. It may be good for the lazy, or the parasite, but it has no benefits to offer you, or your family, other than an early death after a lifetime of slavery for others. To be self-sufficient is to deny the parasites their ability to live off of your wealth and labor, because the more self-sufficient you become, the more you are be able to limit your outside needs which increasingly can come only from the multi-national corporations. You must make this choice or resign yourself to an early, probably painful death after slaving your life away for others.

The present-day perversion of the sciences, medicine, education, Christianity and morality is an outworking of the grand Luciferian Plan to enslave the world and reflects the corruption of present-day government in every nation. Present-day society and governments are set to disintegrate due to internal strife’s and monetary collapse for the introduction of a New Worldly (or secular) Order signified by the Illuminati symbol engraved on the obverse of the American Seal by Luciferian Thomas Jefferson. Franklin D. Roosevelt was so sure he would introduce the NWO he commenced his presidency with his "New Deal" version of dictatorship intended to be developed into totalitarianism when the time was ripe. So confident was Roosevelt of this that he fixed the Illuminati symbol to the back of US dollar bills. Stalin's double-cross at Yalta sent him insane and he is said to have blown his face away with a shotgun.

The following site is an excellent source of additional information. There really are two classes of people in America, and two systems of law: His, and man’s parasitic system.

Subject: Supreme Law Library
From: ronnyholmes@altavista.net
supremelawfirm@altavista.net

Hi David, We have also taken great pains to document the pertinent court cases holding that there are two classes of citizens in America.

A good entry point into our website is the Press Releases at URL:
http://supremelaw.com/press/rels/index.htm

A very advanced application of this knowledge is Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF at URL: http://supremelaw.com/cc/gilberts/opening.htm

See Topic "A" challenging the Jury Selection and Service Act for deliberately excluding State Citizens from grand and petit jury service.

Your education is now sufficient for the following, to give you a real view of exactly what the nature is of man’s government; every version of man’s government which has ever or can ever exist. Remember this as you read:

They........ contemplate government as a private monopoly and the people as hereditary property." Thomas Paine

"R. J. Tavel, JD" <rj@freedomlaw.com>
From: James Montgomery <jamontgomery@InfoAve.Net>

COMMON LAW VS. CONQUEST

The forefathers that represented the states (colonies) at the beginning of this country acted primarily for their interest, this is brought out by Lysander Spooner, in his paper on "The Constitution of no Authority". They represented the states, formally the colonies, which were created by the king of England, by his Charters and his established Cestui

Que Trust. The 1783 Peace Treaty ceded the land above ground to the states, while reserving through Article 6 of the 1783 Treaty his corporation, and the corporations of his British subjects. As I have said before, if you will look at other charters you will see the king is very specific when he gives land by grant, or charter to his subjects. If the king had meant to give the minerals to the states he would have said so very clearly in the 1783 Peace Treaty. The 1783 Peace Treaty is void of any such grant. The king did not relinquish his claim for his heirs and successors, nor could he; his tax was to continue forever, for his expenditure in starting America Inc.. This condition does tie together with what happened post Civil War, the king's interest, continued to be observed and a tax collected.

In a few of the below quotes you will see Lysander Spooner will answer a synopses on how the common law is supposed to work, but at the same time, his arguments are flawed. Not that he is wrong, but he fails to take into account, Charters, Treaties and Conquest. To show a comparison between Lysander Spooner's view on how the law is supposed to work, I am including after his quotes, quotes from the Attorney General during the time of the Reconstruction Acts were issued. The Attorney General defines the

Reconstruction Acts, giving his complete read to their meaning. You will be astounded at his candor and blatant disregard for the 1787 Constitution, and Anglo Saxon common law, so ably expounded upon by the quotes of Lysander Spooner.

"The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give their consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years. AND THE CONSTITUTION, SO FAR AS IT WAS THEIR CONTRACT, DIED WITH THEM. They had no natural power or right to make it obligatory upon their children. It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they COULD bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is to say, the instrument does not purport to be an agreement between any body but "the people" THEN existing; nor does it, either expressly or impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to bind anybody but themselves. Let us see. Its language is: No Treason:" (The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

"THE CONSTITUTION NOT ONLY BINDS NOBODY NOW, BUT IT NEVER DID BIND ANYBODY. It never bound anybody, because it was never agreed to by anybody in such a manner as to make it, on general principles of law and reason, binding upon him.

It is a general principle of law and reason, that a WRITTEN instrument binds no one until he has signed it. (The Informer asked me to inject here: that in Title 12 it is your signature that binds you to the debt, and or the lack of a signature that makes you an involuntary contributor.) This principle is so inflexible a one, that even though a man is unable to write his name, he must still "make his mark," before he is bound by a written contract. This custom was established ages ago, when few men could write their names; when a clerk -- that is, a man who could write -- was so rare and valuable a person, that even if he were guilty of high crimes, he was entitled to pardon, on the ground that the public could not afford to lose his services. Even at that time, a written contract must be signed; and men who could not write, either "made their mark," or signed their contracts by stamping their seals upon wax affixed to the parchment on which their contracts were written. Hence the custom of affixing seals, that has continued to this time."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

"The very men who drafted it, never signed it in any way to bind themselves by it, AS A CONTRACT. And not one of them probably ever would have signed it in any way to bind himself by it, AS A CONTRACT."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

"....And yet we have what purports, or professes, or is claimed, to be a contract -- the Constitution -- made eighty years ago, by men who are now all dead, and who never had any power to bind US, but which (it is claimed) has nevertheless bound three generations of men, consisting of many millions, and which (it is claimed) will be binding upon all the millions that are to come; but which nobody ever signed, sealed, delivered, witnessed, or acknowledged; and which few persons, compared with the whole number that are claimed to be bound by it, have ever read, or even seen, or ever will read, or see. And of those who ever have read it, or ever will read it, scarcely any two, perhaps no two, have ever agreed, or ever will agree, as to what it means."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

"If, then, those who established the Constitution, had no power to bind, and did not attempt to bind, their posterity, the question arises, whether their posterity have bound themselves. If they have done so, they can have done so in only one or both of these two ways, viz., by voting, and paying taxes."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

"3. It cannot be said that, by voting, a man pledges himself to support the Constitution, unless the act of voting be a perfectly voluntary one on his part. Yet the act of voting cannot properly be called a voluntary one on the part of any very large number of those who do vote. It is rather a measure of necessity imposed upon them by others, than one of their own choice. On this point I repeat what was said in a former number, viz.:

"In truth, in the case of individuals, their actual voting is not to be taken as proof of consent, EVEN FOR THE TIME BEING. On the contrary, it is to be considered that, without his consent having even been asked a man finds himself invironed by a government that he cannot resist; a government that forces him to pay money, render service, and forego the exercise of many of his natural rights, under peril of weighty punishments. He sees, too, that other men practice this tyranny over him by the use of the ballot. He sees further, that, if he will but use the ballot himself, he has some chance of relieving himself from this tyranny of others, by subjecting them to his own. In short, he finds himself, without his consent, so situated that, if he use the ballot, he may become a master; if he does not use it, he must become a slave. And he has no other alternative than these two. In self-defense, he attempts the former. His case is analogous to that of a man who has been forced into battle, where he must either kill others, or be killed himself. Because, to save his own life in battle, a man takes the lives of his opponents, it is not to be inferred that the battle is one of his own choosing. Neither in contests with the ballot -- which is a mere substitute for a bullet -- because, as his only chance of self- preservation, a man uses a ballot, is it to be inferred that the contest is one into which he voluntarily entered; that he voluntarily set up all his own natural rights, as a stake against those of others, to be lost or won by the mere power of numbers. On the contrary, it is to be considered that, in an exigency into which he had been forced by others, and in which no other means of self-defense offered, he, as a matter of necessity, used the only one that was left to him."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

Again, in the perfect world, not ruled or controlled by Conquest, Military necessity or public policy, and assuming you had honorable judges and informed juries; you may be relieved of liability for voting. However, since the end of the Civil War, the Conqueror has used voting or your mere presence in the state for proof of residence, as your tacit admission and agreement for whatever action Congress takes, whereby they levy a tax.

The following quote is very true. I have been warning this is the condition of our country, and that the government controls this country contrary to the 1787 U.S. Constitution, at least since March 4 1791 and for sure since March 2, 1867, when an Act of Congress destroyed the 1787 Constitution.

"Go to A_____ B_____, and say to him that "the government" has need of money to meet the expenses of protecting him and his property. If he presumes to say that he has never contracted with us to protect him, and that he wants none of our protection, say to him that that is our business, and not his; that we CHOOSE to protect him, whether he desires us to do so or not; and that we demand pay, too, for protecting him. If he dares to inquire who the individuals are, who have thus taken upon themselves the title of "the government," and who assume to protect him, and demand payment of him, without his having ever made any contract with them, say to him that that, too, is our business, and not his; that we do not CHOOSE to make ourselves INDIVIDUALLY known to him; that we have secretly (by secret ballot) appointed you our agent to give him notice of our demands, and, if he complies with them, to give him, in our name, a receipt that will protect him against any similar demand for the present year. If he refuses to comply, seize and sell enough of his property to pay not only our demands, but all your own expenses and trouble beside. If he resists the seizure of his property, call upon the bystanders to help you (doubtless some of them will prove to be members of our band.) If, in defending his property, he should kill any of our band who are assisting you, capture him at all hazards; charge him (in one of our courts) with murder; convict him, and hang him. If he should call upon his neighbors, or any others who, like him, may be disposed to resist our demands, and they should come in large numbers to his assistance, cry out that they are all rebels and traitors; that "our country" is in danger; call upon the commander of our hired murderers; tell him to quell the rebellion and "save the country," cost what it may. Tell him to kill all who resist, though they should be hundreds of thousands; and thus strike terror into all others similarly disposed. See that the work of murder is thoroughly done; that we may have no further trouble of this kind hereafter. When these traitors shall have thus been taught our strength and our determination, they will be good loyal citizens for many years, and pay their taxes without a why or a wherefore."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

Spooner's below statement is true except for the reality of Conquest.

"These facts are all so vital and so self-evident, that it cannot reasonably be supposed that any one will voluntarily pay money to a "government," for the purpose of securing its protection, unless he first make an explicit and purely voluntary contract with it for that purpose.

It is perfectly evident, therefore, that neither such voting, nor such payment of taxes, as actually takes place, proves anybody's consent, or obligation, to support the Constitution. Consequently we have no evidence at all that the Constitution is binding upon anybody, or that anybody is under any contract or obligation whatever to support it. And nobody is under any obligation to support it."(The Constitution of No Authority", which was written in 1869, Lysander Spooner)

Remember in a previous post where you were shown the Judge Advocate General's authority over the districts was given to the Attorney General, now you know why certain things have taken place in our government. I include it here for you.

"If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of military law which relates to military justice." Congressman Lawrence

The below quotes are from Attorney General Henry Stanbery, June 12, 1867. He defines the Reconstruction Acts, as the head law enforcement officer of the United States government.

"The 3d section declares, "that it shall be the duty of each officer, assigned as aforesaid, to protect all persons in their rights of person and property, to suppress insurrection, disorder, and violence, and to punish, or cause to be punished, all disturbers of the public peace and criminals, and to this end he may allow local civil tribunals to take jurisdiction of and try offenders, or, when in his judgment it may be necessary for the trial of offenders, he shall have power to organize military commissions or tribunals for that purpose; and all interference, under color of State authority; with the exercise of military authority under this act, shall be null and void." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"The 5th section declares the qualification of voters in all elections, as well to frame the new constitution for each State, as in the elections to be held under the provisional government, until the new State constitution is ratified by Congress, and also fixes the qualifications of the delegates to frame the new constitution." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

Are you listening America, a new Constitution, meaning the old one was done away with, I have said this many, many times. Was I right about the state governments being done away with, and provisional governments put in their place? Yes. I have said this affected all states, the government says this condition of Conquest was for a short time and did not affect all of the states. Wrong. Why was the emergency declared? Because the southern states refused to ratify the 14th Amendment. Let me ask you this, is the 14th Amendment regional or national? Does it not affect the whole country? Is it not still enforced? Ask yourself, what would happen if the states removed the 14th Amendment? The Military would again take to the streets; the state governments would again become provisional, until the necessary changes were made to appease the Conquering government.

Read on.

"The 6th section provides, "That until the people of said rebel States shall be by law admitted to representation in the Congress of the United States, any civil governments which may exist therein shall be deemed provisional only, and in all respects subject to the paramount authority of the United States at any time to abolish, modify, control, or supersede the same; and in all elections to any office under such provisional governments all persons shall be entitled to vote, and none others, who are entitled to vote under the provisions of the 5th section of this act; and no person shall be eligible to any office under any such provisional governments who would not be disqualified from holding office under the provisions of the third article of said constitutional amendment." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"We see clearly enough that this act contemplates two distinct governments in each of these ten States: the one military, the other civil. The civil government is recognized as existing at the date of the act. The military government is created by the act." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"Both are provisional, and both are to continue until the new State constitution is framed and the State is admitted to representation in Congress. When that event takes place, both these provisional governments are to cease. In contemplation of this act, this military authority and this civil authority are to be carried on together. The people in these States are made subject to both, and must obey both, in their respective jurisdictions." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"It had all the characteristics and powers of a State government--legislative, judicial, and executive -- and was in the full and lawful exercise of all these powers, except only that it was not entitled to representation as a State of the Union." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

Excuse me Roger Rabbit, where in the 1787 Constitution was Congress given the authority to deny any state government representation in Congress? Add to this the southern states were admitted Republican forms of government, not to mention this Military occupation and Conquest took place during a time of admitted peace? Come on America, WAKE THE HELL UP, cut your television's off, it is late in the day, start studying, time is short.

"Congress was not satisfied with the organic law or constitution under which this civil government was established. That constitution was to be changed in only one particular to make it acceptable to Congress, and that was in the matter of the elective franchise. The purpose, the sole object of this act, is to effect that change, and to effect it by the agency of the people of the State, or such of them as are made voters by means of elections provided for in the act, and in the meantime to preserve order and to punish offenders, if found necessary, by military commissions." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"Whatever power is not given to the military remains with the civil government." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

Wow, did you hear that America? What did they do? Now instead of our co-equal reservation of rights under the 10th Amendment we have only what the Conquering government allows us to have, in case you have forgotten what the 10th Amendment is, I'll use a quote from Jefferson here, and I quote:

"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground; That "all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people."

"To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition." February 15, 1791 Thomas Jefferson

"We see, first of all, that each of these States is "made subject to the military authority of the United States" -- not to the military authority altogether, but with this express limitation -- "as hereinafter prescribed." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"It appears that some of the military commanders have understood this grant of power as all comprehensive, conferring on them the power to remove the executive and judicial officers of the State, and to appoint other officers in their places; to suspend the legislative power of the State; to take under their control, by officers appointed by themselves, the collection and disbursement of the revenues of the State; to prohibit the execution of the laws in matters affecting purely civil and private rights; to suspend or enjoin the execution of the judgments and decrees of the established State courts; to interfere in the ordinary administration of justice in the State courts, by prescribing new qualifications for jurors, and to change, upon the ground of expedience, the existing relations of the parties to contracts, giving protection to one party by violating the rights of the other party." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"There can be no doubt as to the rule of construction according to which we must interpret this grant of power. It is a grant of power to military authority, over civil rights and citizens, in time of peace. It is a new jurisdiction, never granted before, by which, in certain particulars and for certain purposes, the established principle that the military shall be subordinate to the civil authority is reversed." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"The concluding paragraph of this order, No. 10, is in these words, "Any law or ordinance heretofore in force in North Carolina or South Carolina, inconsistent with the provisions of this general order, are hereby suspended and declared inoperative." Thus announcing, not only a power to suspend the laws, but to declare them generally inoperative, and assuming full powers of legislative by the military authority." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"The ground upon which these extraordinary powers are based is thus set forth in military order, No. 1, issued in this district: "The civil government now existing in North Carolina and South Carolina is provisional only, and in all respects subject to the paramount authority of the United [*196] States, at any time to abolish, modify, control, or supersede the same." Thus far the provisions of the act of Congress are well recited. What follows is in these words: "Local laws and municipal regulations, not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or the proclamations of the President, or with such regulations as are or may be prescribed in the orders of the commanding general, are hereby declared to be in force; and, in conformity therewith, civil officers are hereby authorized to continue the exercise of their proper functions, and will be respected and obeyed by the inhabitants." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"This construction of his powers, under the act of Congress, places the military commander on the same footing as the Congress of the United States. It assumes that "the paramount authority of the United States at any time to abolish, modify, control, or supersede," is vested in him as fully as it is reserved to Congress. He deems himself a representative of that paramount authority. He puts himself upon an equality with the law-making power of the Union; the only paramount authority in our government, so far, at least, as the enactment of laws is concerned." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

"He places himself on higher ground than the President, who is simply an executive officers. He assumes, directly or indirectly, all authority of the State, legislative, executive, and judicial, and in effect declares, "I am the State." Attorney General's Office, June 12, 1867

The following are excerpts from the Senate Report, 93rd Congress, November 19, 1973, Special Committee On The Termination Of The National Emergency United States Senate. They were going to terminate all emergency powers, but they found out they did not have the power to do this so guess which one stayed in, the Emergency Act of 1933, the Trading with the Enemy Act October 6, 1917 as amended in March 9, 1933.

"Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency....Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."

"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency.... from, at least, the CIVIL WAR in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency." Senate Report, 93rd Congress, November 19, 1973

I'll let this soak in. August 9, 1998 James

And soak in it should, because until you understand the "thinking" behind the governments of man, you will never understand the only solutions to the problem. Man’s governments have always been criminal enterprises cloaked in so-called law. Let me repeat that; man’s governments have always been criminal enterprises. There has never and can never be an exception to this. They are occupied by the worst kind of criminal parasite who has no desire to work, but will struggle mightily to steal from the common man, using whatever artifice is necessary to conceal his true intent. For reference, I give you Bill Clinton, who admits that he has never held a job outside of "government."

The purpose of this Series was to teach you to think, and to have you start learning the real basis and meaning behind "citizenship" and "allegiance." The real "intent" of the laws which have been passed and which you have been programmed to think were passed in your best interest, when nothing could be further from the Truth. To show you, in a very convincing manner, the criminal intent behind government.

It is only when you have learned this basis that you can begin to understand freedom and responsibility, and can then make a decision on whether to withdraw or not from man’s government; get ye out of her! And yet, there is much more to this than what you are going to read in these papers. There are two jurisdictions on this earth, and the following explains the thinking "within" the other jurisdiction very well, and tells us where our problem started and why we have it today.

Modern "Commercial Law" Is based on Ancient Babylonian Codes

In chapters 17 &18 of Revelation in the Bible it is Revealed that a particular Religious Jurisdiction is recognizable as a "Great Prostitute" who "Rules over the Kings of the Earth" through the use of "Deception", "Magic", & "Merchants". This "Great Prostitute" who uses Deceptive Magic is clearly labeled therein as "BABYLON".

With reference to such reputable modern textbooks as "Historical Jurisprudence" by Guy Carlton, Lee; of Johns Hopkins University in 1922; Babylon's Religious Priesthood is commonly recognized as the source of the modern so called "Laws of Commerce". These "Laws of Commerce" are shown to be a specific body of Codes which authorize the Administration of Compelling Force in Efforts to uphold Contracts, mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" entered into by the contracting parties; & the approval of the Gods were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize the entire process in the minds & the consciences of the contracting parties & all public witnesses.

These Babylonian Religious Codes recognized the ability to buy & sell contracts between merchants in "Commerce". They bought & sold "slaves & the souls of men" in the time of Christ, and before and after. Under this system of Babylonian Codes, contracted debtor people were Forcibly Compelled to perform the contract regardless of Conscionability, or who was the contract creditor. This Babylonian Religious Commercial Code embodied a sub-codification which is modernly recognizable as "Master-Servant Relationships", which are also the source of modern Employer-Employee Codes.

This is all Babylonian Religious Code, where under, "Temporary Slavery" is facilitated. People were not recognized as people thereunder, but were items in Commerce. The Slave could be arrested for not showing up for work on time. Textbooks say that "The slave is not regarded or spoken of as a man, but as a thing, and is reckoned in the same way as cattle". ... "Of ... these Rome was ... possessed from the earliest period ... " ("Historical Jurisprudence" Lee)

History seems to tell that many Israelites had been captured into Slavery in Babylon, but by the time of Christ Jesus, many had returned. The Babylonian Commercial Merchant Codes seemed to infect Israelite society at the same time, and to undermine greatly the Godly Principles of the Mosaic Law. The Pharisees had schools in Babylon "from soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian era; 1626 years". J.H. Hertz (Chief Rabbi 1934) reveals the source of the material which is Codified within their "Babylonian Talmud". This is that source repository from which the modern Talmud draws its historical roots. J.H. Hertz (Chief Rabbi) and others of the same belief are all comfortable referring to it amongst themselves as the "Babylonian Talmud". He states: "The style of the Babylonian Talmud ... is at no time "easy reading"." As the name signifies, the "Babylonian Talmud" contains much of the Commercial SlaveTrading Mercantile Codifications of "Master-Servant Relationships" which originated in Babylon.

The "Babylonian Talmud" refers to those not of the Pharisaical Faith as "Goim" or "Gois", which translates to be "Human Cattle". This is just as the textbooks refer to the Babylonians considering their Slaves. Though direct citations are thin in eluding to Slavery itself, the "Babylonian Talmud" does set forth some such evidence showing clearly that non-Pharisees are to be treated with all of the "Contempt" of Slaves. "All things pertaining to the Goim are like desert, the first person to come along and take them can claim them for his own." Babha Bathra 45. It is permitted to deceive a goi." Babha Kama 113b. And though citations are not clear that this is directly from the Talmud, Pharisaical Literature at A. Rohl. Die Polem. P.20 states "The Life of a Goi and all his physical powers belong to a Jew." And articles published by Henry Ford's newspaper, the Dearborn Independent in 1920-1922 discuss the "Kol Nidre" as a Pharisaical: "prayer, named from its opening words, "All vows"," (kol nidre). It is based on the declaration of the Talmud: "He who wishes that his vows & oaths shall have no value, stand up at the beginning of the year & say:

'All vows which I shall make during the year shall be of no value.' " "

The list goes on and on. Coke and others have defined these People as "Infidels", precisely because History has clearly shown to the more reputable men that the "Oath" of such others means nothing to them. They cannot be "Bound" by "Conscience," & they habitually "Lie" at every turn which may serve their own self-serving interests or those of their "Synagogue of Satan" as referred to by Christ Jesus at Revelation 2:9 & 3:9. This is the nature of their "Law", among these would be Slave Masters. They cannot be expected to be bound to tell the truth to those other people whom they feel EnTitled by the Authority of their Evil God to control such unsuspecting other men as Slaves.

Such "Infidels" were expelled from almost every country in Europe between the 13th & 15th centuries for this precise reason of their tenacious adherence to this Babylonian Master-Slave system of Human Conduct Codes, & their relentless lying and deceit.

The Sadducees apparently stood strong against this corrupting influence, but their days were numbered, for after the destruction of the Temple by Rome in 70 AD, the religious belief system of the Sadducees had met genocide and extinction. The Pharisees (on the other hand) were conspicuously left in the position of authority over all Jews who did not profess Christianity. The Jewish Encyclopedia: (1905 Page 665) shows that the ancient Religion of the Pharisees have been in continuous total control of what is fashionably recognized as the "Jewish Religion", ever since the destruction of Solomon's Temple. "With the destruction of there Temple ...Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the teachings of the Pharisees ... Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism & the life & thought of the Jew for all the future."

With the extinction of the Sadducees, the only Jewish entity which thereafter stood in opposition to the Pharisees and their Babylonian Codified Talmud were the Christians. The powers in Rome were Compromised by this influence. As revealed elsewhere, this Religion of the Pharisees continues to this day under their self proclaimed banner of "Judaism" or "Jews". They are not true "Jews" (*true Jews, in this sense, would mean that they are descended from the Tribe of Judah, which is the reason that this term has been introduced into language and is used to confuse us; so we would "believe" that these men are of Israel. Please see the explanation at the end of this piece for the True explanation. – David) but rather they are of the "Synagogue of Satan", precisely as Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 state. They merely proclaim such out of strategy to effect their purpose. Approximately 85% of them are not even of the "Semitic" bloodline, but rather are of Ashkanazi background/race. They adopted the Pharisaical Babylonian Talmudian Religion in about the year A.D. 740 or so, out of convenience. They know this but they scream "anti-Semite" with spine chilling fervor whenever it suits their evil agenda. Modern descendants of these same Pharisees look to the same "Babylonian Talmud" code of Master/Slave Laws as the principle source for written guidance as a Code of Conduct for their lives.

Textbooks show plainly that Rome is the source of English & American Civil Law. Civil Law is recognized in Black's Law Dictionary as synonymous with "Municipal Law". Rome is well recognizable as an Aggressively Warring & Conquering nation. Textbooks say that the conquered cities "were compelled to pay the wartax" ... "a town thus treated was known as a municipum or "burdenholder"." Many of the conquered peoples were reduced to Slaves.

The Roman merchants engaged in much Slave Trade. They established Slavemarkets. Contracts exchanged hands among merchants for the delivery of Slaves. The Codes which governed these contracts for Slaves was based on the same Codes which the Babylonians had developed. "Of ... these Rome was ... possessed from the earliest period ... ". ("Historical Jurisprudence" Lee). Such Babylonian Master/Slave so called "Law" is modernly still recognizable under either term of "Civil" or "Municipal" Law. The majority of Biblical Scholars recognize Rome to be the 6th head of the 7 headed "Beast" described in Revelation upon which the "Great Prostitute" sat & which was in existence at that time of Christ, the Civil/Military government of Rome. The 7th head is similarly recognized as then prophesying of our modern Anglo-American Civil/Military government. (Please note at end of this Part for an explanation of this, and always remember; the reason most are recognized as Biblical Scholars and funding provided for their work is because they toe the demanded line of dis-information and do not rock the boat with the Truth. – David)

Norman Conquest

The Norman Conquest over the Anglo-Saxon/Celtic people of England in 1066 is vastly underrated in its significance to understanding modern considerations of good government. From Rome, it had the "Solemn Blessings of the Pope". The Pharisaical system of "Babylonian Talmudian" based "Commercial Law" was at that time Forcibly Imposed over the Christian Common Law English People. An article in "The Georgetown Law Journal" V. 71, P 1179 1200) by: Judith A. Shapiro entitled "The Shetar's Effect on English Law" sheds much light.

"The Jews, whom the Normans brought to England ... brought a refined system of commercial law: their own form of commerce and a system of rules to facilitate and govern it. ... Several elements of historical Jewish legal practice have been integrated into the English legal system. Notable among these is the written credit agreement shetar, or starr, as it appears in English documents. The basis of the shetar, or "Jewish Gage," was a lien on all property (including realty) that has been traced as a source of the modern mortgage. Under Jewish law, the shetar permitted a creditor to proceed against all the goods and land of the defaulting debtor. ... Jewish law that debts could be recovered against a loan secured by "all property, movable and immovable" was a weapon of socioeconomic change that tore the fabric of feudal society and established the power of liquid wealth in place of land holding. ... Jewish Law, wherein personal debt superseded rights in real property had become the law of the land." "Footnote 11: H.C. Richardson, The English Jewry Under Angevin Kings 94 (1960) (Jews liquidation of land obligations broke down rigidity of feudal land tenure and facilitated transfer of land to new capitalist class. I hope you understand that this is directly counter to Biblical Law. – David)). Footnote 15: CF. 1 F. Pollock & F.W. Maitland, supra note 3 at 469... (alien to English law for creditor not in possession of land to have rights in it)."

The Pharisees worked with the Normans under the "Blessing of the Pope" of Rome and its Roman Civil Municipal Codes, all so as to establish this "weapon of socioeconomic change that tore the fabric" of the society of the Anglo-Saxon/Celtic peoples. These are the words of Ms Shapirro as they appear in the Georgetown Law Journal. The aggressively warring nature of that Babylonian Talmudian based Code of Pharisaical Conduct is not in question among that circle of scholars. It is a body of Slave/Master Codes. It "tears at the fabric" of that society which it targets.

The "Shetar" is a corruption of the word "Star" and refers to the famous "Star Chamber Courts." "The name star chamber ... has been thought to be ... because the roof was originally studded with stars, because the Jewish covenants (called starrs or stars ...) were originally kept there." Boviers 1860.

"Starr or starra. The old term for contract or obligation among the Jews, being a corruption from the Hebrew word "shetar", a covenant, ... and Blackstone conjectures that the room in which the chests were kept was thence called the "Star Chamber."" "Star Chamber: A court which originally had jurisdiction in cases where the ordinary course of justice was so much obstructed by one party, ... that no inferior court would find its process obeyed. ... In the reign of Henry the 8th, and his successors, the jurisdiction of the court was illegally extended to such a degree (especially in punishing the kings arbitrary proclamations) that it became odious to the nation, and was abolished." Blacks 5th.

These courts of Pharisaical Commercial Master/Slave Codes became heinous in part for their "Secret Proceedings" and their infliction of "Cruel & Unusual Punishments" that they were abolished. They were the essence of the so-called Equity Jurisdiction. It was all run by Chancery Priests, and referred to deceptively as "Courts of Equity", the only thing being "Equal" about them is that all Conquered "Slaves" thereunder are treated more or less Equally. "Courts of Chancery" is a more honest name, as it was great "Chance" taken to go before such.

"The whole of equity jurisprudence prevailing in England & the United States is mainly based on the civil law", so says Boviers Law Dictionary of 1868. "Civil Law" is from Rome. There was no "Equity Jurisprudence" in England prior to the Norman Conquest. The Norman Conquest had the "solemn approval of the Pope" of Rome according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. Other sources conform the Roman Popes support and blessing.

The conclusion to Reasonable Men is that the Norman's "War of Aggression" was jointly backed by the Christ Killing Pharisees and the Pope of Rome, so as to Forcibly Impose the Roman Civil/Municipal Codes of Babylonian Talmudic based Master/Slave relations. These were mere Tools for Slave Control which were early imposed by Evil Men with great influence within the Pharisaical and Catholic religious communities. Any Truly Godly Spirituality which may have existed within either of those religious organizations was most assuredly bound & gagged by the more powerful forces of Evil therein at the times of the Norman Conquest. As at the Crusades. As at the Inquisition. These entities have very bad track records.

Evil men Aggressively made Religious War against the Christian/Common Law Anglo-Saxon/Celtic Peoples of England in 1066. The "Babylonian Talmud" was completed well before the Norman Conquest of 1066. It's all the same basic Master/Slave Commerce form of Code of Human Conduct. It all treats living breathing People as "Merchandise" in Commerce to be bought and sold as those "Slaves & the Souls of Men" as referred to in Revelation 18:13. This entire body of Codified Human Conduct is all so amorally lacking in fidelity to the Supreme Laws of "Love of Neighbor" from YHVH as taught by His Son Yeshuah as to be clearly a policy of the "Synagogue of Satan" as referred to at Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. It is easy to summarize that this is that precise same Code of Human Conduct of which the Pharisee "Money Changers" were using to corrupt the Temple in Jerusalem, and of which Christ Jesus overturned their tables and drove them out of His Father's House with the whip. It is easy to summarize that this is the Code of Conduct upon which the Pharisees moved to whip up the mob into such a fervent state of Anarchy as to abort "Due Process of Law" and to have Yeshua the Christ Lawlessly nailed to the Cross (or stake).

This Code of Conduct embodied within the "Babylonian Talmud" is very large, but it contains specific portions which are designed to "Tear at the Fabric" of the society which is its target. These are the words of Ms Shapirro, as set forth in the Georgetown Law Journal. This is not the wording of "Anti-Semitic Right Wing Extremists." Ms Shapiro's term "Tear" is specifically used to denote that process which obliterated the "Fabric of ... Society", as it had existed prior to that War of Aggression. It would seem Reasonable to conclude that this is a Code of Human Conduct based on "Terrorism". Certainly the word "Tear" seems related to "Terrorism". Certainly the Anglo-Saxon/Celtic Christian People were greatly Fear Inspired by the forcible imposition of this "Babylonian Talmud" based Code of Human Conduct. The wording of Ms Shapirro Reasonably seems to be an acknowledgment that "Terrorism" was used by the Normans & the Pharisees "who call themselves Jews" as a matter of policy under that Code of Human Conduct known as the "Babylonian Talmud".

This entire body of Roman Civil Law is based upon "Contracts", and it was early incorporated into what was known as English "Law Merchant", which many fine scholars have confused as being a true part of the English "Common Law". Such happened only after corrupting influence of the Norman Conquest.

Contracts are only enforceable in Courts of so-called "Equity." "Equity" jurisdiction was allowed to enter into American Jurisprudence by way of Article 3, Section 21 of the U.S. Constitution. Such was a slap in the face of Christ Jesus, and much Evil has worked its purpose in this land by way of that compromise of Godly Principles.

However, Equity is purged from all of its authority to adjudicate anything if proper "Due Process of Law" is invoked, as such process is set forth in Beacon Theaters v Westover. This modern essence of "Law" allows Americans to free themselves by "Due Process of Law" from the Babylonian Master/Slave jurisdiction of so called "Equity". C.B.S. May 99.

We are commanded to have no false gods. What does this mean? And how does this relate to the above? And how does this relate to clearing our minds of the nonsense of this earth? The false gods of the earth are the illusions we build within our own minds.

From: "Gregory Thomas. Williams" <ekklesia@presys.com>

God has said, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me."1 The words "gods" and "God" are translated from the single word 'elohiym2 in the plural. 'Elohiym’ is defined "rulers, judges"3 and "occasionally applied as deference to magistrates"4 while in the New Testament the word God is translated from the Greek word theos which figuratively means "a magistrate."5

If you were in court and spoke to a judge in Hebrew or Greek what you called him would be translated into 'god'. This simple fact which is verified in your own Strong's Concordance has lead to one of the most common and devastating misconception concerning the Bible and the teachings of the prophets.

The emperors were often referred to as gods using the word theos. Not because any one believed that they created heaven and earth but because they were the chief magistracy and ruler of the people.6 When I read what Karen wrote:

... In Websters an oath is confirmation of the truth by naming something sacred. As in I swear to tell the whole truth so help me God etc. Now that would be a type of oath.... Karen

It suddenly struck me funny, in a peculiar way. The words 'so help me god'... in what person are we speaking? Are we addressing the judge, the god of the court, who can now punish us if he believes we are not telling him the truth? (You are known by whose L(l)aws you study and keep, and as such, who is your J(j)udge. – David)

Gregory at the ekklesia

http://presys.com/~ekklesia/welcome.htm home page

1 Exodus 20:3

2 Strong's No. 0430 'elohiym {el-o-heem'} plural of 433

3 On line Bible and Concordance. Woodside Bible Fellowship.

4 Strong's Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary.

5 Strong's Greek Dictionary of the New Testament.

6 "The last act was the formal decree of the senate by which Augustus, like his father Julius before him, was added to the number of the gods recognized by the Roman state." Encylopedia Britanica 1953,Vol II, pp. 689b

The above gives a slightly different way of looking at the law by which we chose to be governed. And make no mistake, we chose to be so governed. There is no government of man which is capable of governing a man devoted to His Law. It is not possible. However, when we chose different gods to answer to, there are material changes taking place not only in our relationships, but within ourselves as well.

Now, this brings us to Children, and Education. Frankly, if so-called public education did not have evil intent behind the "system" that is so obviously there, what I have done in researching and writing this Series would not have been necessary. Unfortunately, history is replete with examples of hidden conclaves, suppressed information and altered records. It would be silly to "assume" that the situation today is any different than yesterday, for one of the truest of all maxims is that history repeats itself, endlessly. And this occurs solely due to the foolishness of man.

When you finally come to grips with this, as I did many years ago, you confront personal responsibility. I compare it to finally growing up, when you learn that learning only occurs when you desire it to, and that when others pay for teachers, those teachers teach what they are told to teach, and if it is the Truth or not is of no consequence. The teacher who teaches for money will always be responsible to the source of his pay, as this source is his master. No "system" can work in any other way. This is why it is important to learn what is really happening in the education system, for education determines what course any nation is to take. This is why public education mandated for all children is one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto. It has nothing to do with education; it has to do with careful, controlled programming, of the children. And to assert, as several have done to me, that public education has been around for centuries and has always proven to be of a great benefit is to miss the target entirely. What was called public education in the past was a local concern, where the parents paid the teachers, sometimes through a church, and local control of the subjects taught was absolute. No one would have dared try and dictate to those parents what was to be taught to their children!

Today, the situation is entirely different. Centralized control of education is attempted for one purpose, and one purpose only; programming of the children of the nation into a mold desired by those who will benefit from the molding. If you fail to understand this, I suggest you acquire a copy of the Communist Manifesto and begin studying. Perhaps some reasons may occur to you after some time spent at this.

One of the best sources of information on public education and the intent behind it can be found here:
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/natural.htm

Please read the two following books, found on the above site, and then decide, public education, and television, for your children, or not?

Assault on Childhood

Brain-Wash

You will also find The Empire of "The City" here, which I highly recommend! And under Giant Humans and Dinosaurs, you will find some pictures. With one picture, of a very old hammer, you will find this:

This interesting photograph is of a hammer found in similar strata. It's iron head and wooden handle are solidified in sandstone. Metallurgical studies show that it was constructed of a type of iron that could not have been made under present atmospheric conditions. It is believed that before the flood our atmosphere was compressed to approximately twice its current density, and no ultraviolet radiation.

Now, remember back to an earlier Part of The Series where I mentioned how the world was enclosed in a shell of metal (hydrogen), which combined with much of the oxygen then in the atmosphere and became rain when the shell came down, causing the Great Flood, and how the atmosphere prior to the Great Flood was much denser and contained a much greater percentage of oxygen. To understand all of the lies we have been told, all of this information is essential. And, this information is also essential to assist us in making the correct choice in choosing our G(g)od.

But to make sense of this information, you also need to closely examine what is behind the people who control Communism, Socialism, Capitalism, and all other isms, so that you can armor yourself and your family and friends with the knowledge that will set you free! And to do this, you need a deep look into the thinking behind these people.

http://www.devvy.com/~devvy/fred.html

"To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world over population problem."

- Dr. LaMont Cole, Yale University environmentalist

"Right now there are just way too many people on the planet. A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels would be ideal."

- Ted Turner, husband of Hanoi Jane Fonda, Chmn of the Board of Turner Broadcasting, who owns CNN; Director, Martin Luther King Center.

"Every child who believes in God is mentally ill."

- Dr. Paul Brandwein, leading U.S. child psychologist

"We reject the idea of private property."

- Peter Berle, former President, National Audubon Society, Board Member, Sierra Club

"I would think that if you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees, that we would someday become Communists."

- Jane Fonda, wife of Ted Turner. American women have poured double digit millions of dollars into her pocket for her fitness videos. Telling people how to get a figure created through plastic surgery....

"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

- Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II, founder, World Wildlife Fund. Do you suppose his offspring think any differently? Like father, like sons......

"We've got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy."

- Tim Wirth, former member of Congress, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs, and one of a number of politicians (including Barbie Boxer, Barney Frank, Al Gore, John Kerry, Daniel Moynihan, Chris Shays and others) who have been identified as "Green Leadership for the '90's."

You Don't Say by Fred Gielow can be ordered through Accuracy in Media at 1-800-787-4567; cost is $16.00 + S/H

Let me give you a couple more quotes from those caring, compassionate liberal nut cases:

"Human happiness and certainly human fecundity [productivity] are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, it isn't true. Somewhere along the line - at about a billion years ago and maybe half that - we quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the earth.... Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."

- David Graber, a research biologist at the National Park Service.

"The most effective means of fighting crime in the United States is to outlaw the possession of any type of firearm by the civilian populace."

Adolph Hitler? No. Attorney General Janet the Butcher of Waco Reno, during a speech at a B'nai B'rith meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 1991.

For a better understanding of this: http://www.devvy.com/unguncontrol.html

And why does all of this remain hidden?
http://www.thewinds.org/arc_features/media/disinfo9-97.html

Hands of the Media; very well written.

And remember the following, every time you are tempted to "believe" anything told to you by the media (particularly about your "obligation" to vote!):

How the Controlled media Operates and for Whom

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years ... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

--David Rockefeller, in an address given to Catherine Graham, publisher of The Washington Post and other media luminaries in attendance in Baden Baden, Germany at the June 1991 annual meeting of the world elite Bilderberg Group.

*************************************************

"One night, probably in 1880, John Swinton, then the preeminent New York journalist, one of the media's most respected professionals, head of the New York Times, was the guest of honour at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft. Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press. Swinton outraged his colleagues by replying:

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with.

Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

It is only when you truly begin to grasp the absolute control, the absolute evil, and the absolute filth of these people that you can begin to grasp what the future holds. It would be ludicrous to "assume" that people with the kind of money and power that these people have would simply talk of reducing populations, and not start taking active measures to see to it that their wishes come true.

It is for this reason that all man’s governments fail, and are doomed to fail. It is the greed, the absolute lack of morals which concentrate at the top of any power pyramid and which assure that the only possible result is death and destruction.

Now, for what you have read above, how does that compare with His Word? What, exactly, does it mean to be a "Christian?" Go to church on Sunday? Maybe play cards with a few of the church members once a week? Or even, maybe, read the Bible? Does it make any sense to read the Bible, if you do not take it seriously? There is a young man reading this Series and attending a Catholic college (strange combination). As he tells me, he is specifically told not to take the Bible literally. It is either His Word, and thus the most serious and literal subject in the Universe, or it is not. Which is it? And knowing this, then, what does it mean to be a Christian?

Let me give you 5 rules to live by:

  1. Love thy Creator with all of thy heart, and all of thy soul. This was given by the Christ as the first and greatest Commandment. Think what this means as regards His Word, and His Laws. As Jesus declared this the first and great Commandment, consider how we should lay aside all else to come under pre-eminence to His Word which is to conform to His Law. Now, as we begin to understand the purpose and intent of His Law, think of the benefits to us for doing this!
  2. Love thy neighbor as thy self is the second commandment which, coupled with the first and great commandment encompasses all of the Law and the teachings of the prophets. To me this means that when you neglect the welfare of your neighbor, you have disadvantaged and actively damaged yourself. And from what we have read previously, we see how this hardness of heart and the greed of those who have seized control of the nations/tribes has brought the world to the precipice of destruction. One small transgression, left uncorrected, eventually becomes an avalanche of pain and suffering for everyone. Without active, ever-present love for our neighbor, such destruction will be the ultimate result of any man's attempt to govern either himself or other men, even under the letter of the Creator’s Laws.
  3. Never damage anyone. There is a lot more to this than meets the eye. For instance, withholding information can be as damaging as any deliberate act that you may envision. Or, failure to act when a neighbor is attacked or a false claim is made against him. All of these, and much more, are contained within these three words, for omission is often as damaging as commission. And the omission most commonly committed is the failure to help others. Would you like to see your problems go away, or, at least, become insignificant? Try helping others, and watch the change within yourself.

    But, within this there also lurks the specter of damage that is much more direct, for money. Do you sell food? With Aspartame or fluoride or any of the hundreds of other so-called additives which we know to be damaging to people? Or chemicals? To farmers who are destroying their land to make the payments to the bankers? Or drugs? So-called legal drugs? This is where you will need to start making choices for the future; for your future. How can you maintain any activity you are engaged in for money which is damaging to another, whether they be knowing or not, in the face of the knowledge you now have? Now, you are beginning to arrive at the crossroads of what it means to be a Christian.

  4. Never tell a lie. Think this is easy? Try it for a single day. And this means not any of the little white lies to keep the spouse smiling, the children satisfied, or the boss happy. This means exactly what it says; never tell a lie. Again, there is more to this that the simple statement, for a lie can be of omission of facts or information, in other words, a lack of help, as much as the simple, deliberate misstatement of facts, however simple those facts may appear to you. Or, the selling of a product that you know to be harmful without informing those you are selling to. As another instance, how about all of those Xmas decorations you have stored? Going to get rid of them? Does this mean you are going to sell them, or destroy them? And, if you decide to sell them, are you going to inform those you sell to exactly why you are getting rid of the paganism in your home?
  5. Never make a decision based simply on the money involved. There is no right way to do the wrong thing! Buy the best, most healthful food available, not the cheapest, on-sale product you can find. Do not "bank," or allow your labor to be fractionalized to damage others. Get out of debt, and do it now. Whatever this takes, including selling property, heirlooms, or learning to cancel the fraudulent debts created by the bankers. Whatever is necessary, do it, and learn to live free. And teach your children to do the same. "Owe no man any thing, but love one another: for he that loves another has fulfilled the Law" (Romans 13:8).

If you can learn to live with these five simple rules, you will be closer to Him than 99.9% of all people who have ever lived. It may not be enough, but it is a start. This is where I am started to have trouble when I first began learning, in taking His Word literally. Is it True? Then what part of it do I disregard, for my own purposes? And what this comes down to is that none of us, not me, not you, not anyone alive on this earth, is a Righteous man, without Him. Thank you, My Creator, my Lord Jesus Christ, for Grace.

For without faith it is all dead works. When I started to have trouble, in taking the letter of His Word literally, it was without the Light of the Spirit. For without the Spirit, without being born-again, none of us is, not me, not you, not anyone alive on this earth, can be a Righteous man. And Jesus' instruction is, "Be perfect (or mature and complete, lacking none of the virtues) as your Father in heaven is perfect". Thank you, My Creator, for Grace in making a way through the new birth which is the Spiritual regeneration and conception of the soul by faith without the lust of our physical birth into a fallen material world.

Concerning those who are born-again, Jesus said, "You are worthy" (Revelation 3:4-5). These words are as astounding as are the words in Romans 8:33b, "God says I am righteous." (Way Translation). There in the white Light of God's righteousness, hear the sweet voice of Jesus as He says, "These are Mine. They are righteous. They are worthy. They shall walk with Me in white."

How can one receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit which is to be born-again? Our life must manifest the PRESENT Truth. Only by becoming a written epistle of what Jesus is doing NOW on this earth can we come under the Blood and partake of Christ's righteousness (I John 1:7). And never forget that the present Truth of this earth includes everything that the Christ told us, to the smallest detail.

Oaths

The following was just sent to me. If I had it earlier, I would have used in an early part of the Series. However, it may fit better here than anywhere, especially after the material presented in this part of The Series about the Talmud.

From ICE's web site: His comments:
http://www.coolmedia.net/ice/cccc1.htm

At the above link is one of the more interesting and informative articles I have read in quite a while. I have seen bits of its information here and there, but the way this article puts it together is unique and (I think) worth sharing.

Nothing Succeeds but Success By Ralph (6/15/99)

In all of history there has been but one successful protest against an income tax. It is little understood in that light, primarily because the remnants of protest group still exist, but no longer wish to appear to be "anti-government." They don't talk much about these roots. Few even know them. We need to go back in time about 400 years to find this success. It succeeded only because the term "jurisdiction" was still well understood at that time as meaning "oath spoken." "Juris," in the original Latin meaning, is "oath." "Diction" as everyone knows, means "spoken."

The protest obviously didn't happen here. It occurred in England. Given that the origins of our law are traced there, most of the relevant facts in this matter are still applicable in this nation. Here's what happened.

The Bible had just recently been put into print. To that time, only the churches and nobility owned copies, due to given to the extremely high cost of paper. Contrary to what you've been taught, it was not the invention of movable type that led to printing this and other books. That concept had been around for a very long time. It just had no application. Printing wastes some paper. Until paper prices fell, it was cheaper to write books by hand than to print them with movable type. The handwritten versions were outrageously costly, procurable only by those with extreme wealth: churches, crowns and the nobility. The wealth of the nobility was attributable to feudalism. "Feud" is Old English for "oath." The nobility held the land under the crown. But unimproved land, itself, save to hunter/gatherers, is rather useless. Land is useful to farming. So that's how the nobility made their wealth. No, they didn't push a plow. They had servants to do it.

The nobility wouldn't sell their land, nor would they lease it. They rented it. Ever paid rent without a lease? Then you know that if the landlord raised the rent, you had no legal recourse. You could move out or pay. But what if you couldn't have moved out? Then you'd have a feel for what feudalism was all about.

A tenant wasn't a freeman. He was a servant to the (land)lord, the noble. In order to have access to the land to farm it, the noble required that the tenant kneel before him, hat in hand, swear an oath of fealty and allegiance and kiss his ring (extending that oath in that last act to the heirs of his estate). That oath established a servitude. The tenant then put his plow to the fields. The rent was a variable. In good growing years it was very high, in bad years it fell. The tenant was a subsistence farmer, keeping only enough of the produce of his labors to just sustain him and his family. Rent was actually an "income tax." The nobleman could have demanded 100% of the productivity of his servant except . . . under the common law, a servant was akin to livestock. He had to be fed. Not well fed, just fed, same as a horse or cow. And, like a horse or cow, one usually finds it to his benefit to keep it fed, that so that the critter is productive. Thus, the tenant was allowed to keep some of his own productivity. Liken it to a "personal and dependent deductions."

The freemen of the realm, primarily the tradesmen, were unsworn and unallieged. They knew it. They taught their sons the trade so they'd also be free when grown. Occasionally they took on an apprentice under a sworn contract of indenture from his father. His parents made a few coins. But the kid was the biggest beneficiary. He'd learn a trade. He'd never need to become a tenant farmer. He'd keep what he earned. He was only apprenticed for a term of years, most typically about seven. The tradesmen didn't need adolescents; they needed someone strong enough to pull his own weight. They'd not take on anyone under 13. By age 21 he'd have learned enough to practice the craft. That's when the contract expired. He was then called a "journeyman." Had he made a journey? No. But, if you pronounce that word, it's "Jur-nee-man." He was a "man," formerly ("nee"), bound by oath ("jur)."

He'd then go to work for a "master" (craftsman). The pay was established, but he could ask for more if he felt was worth more. And he was free to quit. Pretty normal, eh? Yes, in this society that's quite the norm. But 400 some years ago these men were the exceptions, not the rule. At some point, if the journeyman was good at the trade, he'd be recognized by the market as a "master" (craftsman) and people would be begging him to take their children as apprentices, so they might learn from him, become journeymen, and keep what they earned when manumitted at age 21!

The oath of the tenant ran for life. The oath of the apprentice's father ran only for a term of years. Still, oaths were important on both sides. In fact, the tradesmen at one point established guilds (means "gold") as a protection against the potential of the government attempting to bind them into servitudes by compelled oaths.

When an apprentice became a journeyman, he was allowed a membership in the guild only by swearing a secret oath to the guild. He literally swore to "serve gold." Only gold. He swore he'd only work for pay! Once so sworn, any other oath of servitude would be a perjury of that oath. He bound himself for life to never be a servant, save to the very benevolent master: gold! (Incidentally, the Order of Free and Accepted Masons is a remnant of one of these guilds. Their oath is a secret. They'd love to have you think that

the "G" in the middle of their logo stands for "God." The obvious truth is that it stands for "GOLD.")

Then the Bible came to print. The market for this tome wasn't the wealthy. They already had a handwritten copy. Nor was it the tenants. They were far too poor to make this purchase. The market was the tradesmen - and the book was still so costly that it took the combined life savings of siblings to buy a family Bible. The other reason that the tradesmen were the market was that they'd also been taught how to read as part of their apprenticeship. As contractors they had to know how to do that! Other than the families of the super-rich (and the priests) nobody else knew how to read.

These men were blown away when they read Jesus' command against swearing oaths (Matt 5: 33-37). This was news to them. For well over a millennia they'd been trusting that the church - originally just the Church of Rome, but now also the Church of England - had been telling them everything they needed to know in that book. Then they found out that Jesus said, "Swear no oaths." Talk about an eye-opener.

Imagine seeing a conspiracy revealed that went back over 1000 years. Without oaths there'd have been no tenants, laboring for the nobility, and receiving mere subsistence in return. The whole society was premised on oaths; the whole society CLAIMED it was Christian, yet, it violated a very simple command of Christ! And the tradesmen had done it, too, by demanding sworn contracts of indenture for apprentices and giving their own oaths to the guilds. They had no way of knowing that was prohibited by Jesus! They were angry. "Livid" might be a better term. The governments had seen this coming. What could they do? Ban the book? The printing would have simply moved underground and the millennia long conspiracy would be further evidenced in that banning. They came up with a better scheme. You call it the "Reformation."

In an unprecedented display of unanimity, the governments of Europe adopted a treaty. This treaty would allow anyone the State-right of founding a church. It was considered a State- right, there and then. The church would be granted a charter. It only had to do one very simple thing to obtain that charter.

It had to assent to the terms of the treaty.

Buried in those provisions, most of which were totally innocuous, was a statement that the church would never oppose the swearing of lawful oaths. Jesus said, "None." The churches all said (and still say), "None, except

" Who do you think was (is) right?

The tradesmen got even angrier! They had already left the Church of England. But with every new "reformed" church still opposing the clear words of Christ, there was no church for them to join - or found. They exercised the right of assembly to discuss the Bible. Some of them preached it on the street corners, using their right of freedom of speech. But they couldn't establish a church, which followed Jesus' words, for that would have required assent to that treaty which opposed what Jesus had commanded.

To show their absolute displeasure with those who'd kept this secret for so long, they refused to give anyone in church or state any respect. It was the custom to doff one's hat when he encountered a priest or official. They started wearing big, ugly black hats, just so that the most myopic of these claimed "superiors" wouldn't miss the fact that the hat stayed atop their head. Back then the term "you" was formal English, reserved for use when speaking to a superior. "Thee" was the familiar pronoun, used among family and friends. So they called these officials only by the familiar pronoun "thee" or by their Christian names, "George, Peter, Robert, etc." We call these folk "Quakers." That was a nickname given to them by a judge. One of them had told the judge that he'd better "Quake before the Lord, God almighty." The judge, in a display of irreverent disrespect replied, "Thee are the quaker here." They found that pretty funny, it being such a total misnomer (as you shall soon see), and the nickname stuck. With the huge membership losses from the Anglican Church - especially from men who'd been the more charitable to it in the past - the church was technically bankrupt. It wasn't just the losses from the Quakers. Other people were leaving to join the new "Reformed Churches." Elsewhere in Europe, the Roman Church had amassed sufficient assets to weather this storm. The far newer Anglican Church had not.

But the Anglican Church, as an agency of the State, can't go bankrupt. It becomes the duty of the State to support it in hard times. Parliament did so. It enacted a tax to that end. A nice religious tax, and by current standards a very low tax, a tithe (10%). But it made a deadly mistake in that. The Quakers, primarily as tradesmen, recognized this income tax as a tax "without jurisdiction,' at least so far as they went. As men unsworn and unallieged, they pointed out that they didn't have to pay it, nor provide a return. Absent their oaths establishing this servitude, there was "no jurisdiction." And they were right. Despite laws making it a crime to willfully refuse to make a return and pay this tax, NONE were charged or arrested.

That caused the rest of the society to take notice. Other folk who'd thought the Quakers were "extremists" suddenly began to listen to them. As always, money talks. These guys were keeping all they earned, while the rest of the un-sworn society, thinking this tax applied to them, well; they were out 10%. The Quaker movement expanded significantly, that proof once made in the marketplace. Membership in the Anglican Church fell even further, as did charity to it. The taxes weren't enough to offset these further losses. The tithe (income) tax was actually counterproductive to the goal of supporting the church. The members of the government and the churchmen were scared silly. If this movement continued to expand at the current rate, no one in the next generation would swear an oath. Who'd then farm the lands of the nobility? Oh, surely someone would, but not as a servant working for subsistence. The land would need to be leased under a contract, with the payment for that use established in the market, not on the unilateral whim of the nobleman. The wealth of the nobility, their incomes, was about to be greatly diminished. And the Church of England, what assets it possessed, would need to be sold-off, with what remained of that church greatly reduced in power and wealth. But far worse was the diminishment of the respect demanded by the priests and officials. They'd always held a position of superiority in the society. What would they do when all of society treated them only as equals?

They began to use the term "anarchy." But England was a monarchy, not an anarchy. And that was the ultimate solution to the problem, or so those in government thought. There's an aspect of a monarchy that Americans find somewhat incomprehensible, or at least we did two centuries ago. A crown has divine right, or at least it so claims. An expression of the divine right of a crown is the power to rule by demand. A crown can issue commands. The king says, "jump." Everyone jumps.

Why do they jump? Simple. It's a crime to NOT jump. To "willfully fail (hey, there's a couple of familiar terms) to obey a crown command" is considered to be a treason, high treason. The British crown issued a Crown Command to end the tax objection movement.

Did the crown order that everyone shall pay the income tax? No, that wasn't possible. There really was "no jurisdiction." And that would have done nothing to cure the lack of respect. The crown went one better. It ordered that every man shall swear an oath of allegiance to the crown! Damned Christian thing to do, eh? Literally!

A small handful of the tax objectors obeyed. Most refused. It was a simple matter of black and white. Jesus said "swear not at all." They opted to obey Him over the crown. That quickly brought them into court, facing the charge of high treason. An official would take the witness stand, swearing that he had no record of the defendant's oath of allegiance. Then the defendant was called to testify, there being no right to refuse to witness against one's self. He refused to accept the administered oath. That refusal on the record, the court instantly judged him guilty. Took all of 10 minutes. That expedience was essential, for there were another couple hundred defendants waiting to be tried that day for their own treason’s against the crown.

In short order the jails reached their capacity, plus. But they weren't filled as you'd envision them. The men who'd refused the oaths weren't there. Their children were. There was a "Stand-in" law allowing for that.

There was no social welfare system. The wife and children of a married man in prison existed on the charity of church and neighbors, or they ceased to exist, starving to death. It was typical for a man convicted of a petty crime to have one of his kid's stand in for him for 30 or 90 days. That way he could continue to earn a living, keeping bread on the table, without the family having to rely on charity. However, a man convicted of more heinous crimes would usually find it impossible to convince his wife to allow his children to serve his time. The family would prefer to exist on charity rather than see him back in society. But in this case the family had no option. The family was churchless. The neighbors were all in the same situation. Charity was non-existent for them. The family was destined to quick starvation unless one of the children stood- in for the breadwinner.

Unfortunately, the rational choice of which child should serve the time was predicated on which child was the least productive to the family earnings. That meant nearly the youngest, usually a daughter.

Thus, the prisons of England filled with adolescent females, serving the life sentences for their dads. Those lives would be short. There was no heat in the jails. They were rife with tuberculosis and other deadly diseases. A strong man might last several years. A small girl measured her remaining time on earth in months. It was Christian holocaust, a true sacrifice of the unblemished lambs. (And, we must note, completely ignored in virtually every history text covering this era, lest the crown, government and church be duly embarrassed.) Despite the high mortality rate the jails still overflowed. There was little fear that the daughters would be raped or die at the brutality of other prisoners. The other prisoners, the real felons, had all been released to make room. Early release was premised on the severity of the crime. High treason was the highest crime. The murderers, thieves, arsonists, rapists, etc., had all been set free.

That had a very profound effect on commerce. It stopped. There were highwaymen afoot on every road. Thugs and muggers ruled the city streets. The sworn subjects of the crown sat behind bolted doors, in cold, dark homes, wondering how they'd exist when the food and water ran out. They finally dared to venture out to attend meetings to address the situation. At those meeting they discussed methods to overthrow the crown to which they were sworn! Call that perjury. Call that sedition. Call it by any name, they were going to put their words into actions, and soon, or die from starvation or the blade of a thug. Here we should note that chaos (and nearly anarchy: "no crown") came to be, not as the result of the refusal to swear oaths, but as the direct result of the governmental demand that people swear them!

The followers of Jesus' words didn't bring that chaos, those who ignored that command of Christ brought it. The crown soon saw the revolutionary handwriting on the wall and ordered the release of the children and the recapture of the real felons, before the government was removed from office under force of arms. The courts came up with the odd concept of an "affirmation in lieu of oath." The Quakers accepted that as a victory. Given what they'd been through, that was understandable. However, Jesus also prohibited affirmations, calling the practice an oath "by thy head." Funny that He could foresee the legal concept of an affirmation 1600 years before it came to be. Quite a prophecy!

When the colonies opened to migration, the Quakers fled Europe in droves, trying to put as much distance as they could between themselves and crowns. They had a very rational fear of a repeat of the situation.

That put a lot of them here, enough that they had a very strong influence on politics. They could have blocked the ratification of the Constitution had they opposed it. Some of their demands were incorporated into it, as were some of their concessions, in balance to those demands. Their most obvious influence found in the Constitution is the definition of treason, the only crime defined in that document. Treason here is half of what can be committed under a crown. In the United States treason may only arise out of an (overt) ACTION. A refusal to perform an action at the command of the government is not a treason, hence, NOT A CRIME. You can find that restated in the Bill of Rights, where the territorial jurisdiction of the courts to try a criminal act is limited to the place wherein the crime shall have been COMMITTED. A refusal or failure is not an act "committed" - it's the opposite, an act "omitted." In this nation "doing nothing" can't be criminal, even when someone claims the power to command you do something. That concept in place, the new government would have lasted about three years. You see, if it was not a crime to fail to do something, then the officers of that government would have done NOTHING - save to draw their pay. That truth forced the Quakers to a concession.

Anyone holding a government job would need be sworn (or affirmed) to support the Constitution. That Constitution enabled the Congress to enact laws necessary and proper to control the powers vested in these people. Those laws would establish their duties. Should such an official "fail" to perform his lawful duties, he'd evidence in that omission that his oath was false.

To swear a false oath is an ACTION. Thus, the punishments for failures would exist under the concept of perjury, not treason. But that was only regarding persons under oath of office, who were in office only by their oaths.

And that's still the situation. It's just that the government has very cleverly obscured that fact so that the average man will pay it a rent, a tax on income. As you probably know, the first use of income tax here came well in advance of the 16th amendment. That tax was NEARLY abolished by a late 19th century Supreme Court decision. The problem was that the tax wasn't apportioned, and couldn't be apportioned, that because of the fact that it rested on the income of each person earning it, rather than an up-front total, divided and meted out to the several States according to the census. But the income tax wasn't absolutely abolished. The court listed a solitary exception. The incomes of federal officers, derived as a benefit of office, could be so taxed. You could call that a "kick back" or even a "return."

Essentially, the court said that what Congress gives, it can demand back. As that wouldn't be income derived within a State, the rule of apportionment didn't apply. Make sense? Now, no court can just make up rulings. The function of a court is to answer the questions posed to it. And in order to pose a question, a person needs "standing." The petitioner has to show that an action has occurred which effects him, hence, giving him that standing. For the Supreme Court to address the question of the income of officers demonstrates that the petitioner was such. Otherwise, the question couldn't have come up.

Congress was taxing his benefits of office. But Congress was ALSO taxing his outside income, that from sources with a State. Could have been interest, dividends, rent, royalties, and even alimony. If he had a side job, it might have even been commissions or salary. Those forms of income could not be taxed. However, Congress could tax his income from the benefits he derived by being an officer.

That Court decision was the end of all income taxation. The reason is pretty obvious. Rather than tax the benefits derived out of office, it's far easier to just reduce the benefits up- front! Saves time. Saves paper. The money stays in Treasury rather than going out,